Accessibility
At Bongo, we believe that websites should be accessible and user-friendly for the widest possible audience. We continue to work towards adhering to the accepted standards of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and continue to bring all areas of our site to the same level of web accessibility.
Should you experience any difficulty in accessing our online platform, please don’t hesitate to contact us.
Email us at [email protected]
Accessibility features of this online platform:
- Minimal Level AA contrast between foreground and background colors
- Descriptive text provided for screen readers (including table summaries and alternative text for images)
- The ability for institutions to add captions and transcripts to videos both they and their students upload into our platform
- The ability to add live captions in online meeting spaces
- VPAT Version 2.3 from the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
Bongo Accessibility Conformance Report WCAG Edition
VPAT® Version 2.4 (Revised)
Name of Product/Version: Bongo / 26.3
Product Description
Bongo is a video assessment solution that enables experiential learning and soft skill development at scale. Organizations use Bongo’s structured video workflows to facilitate repeated skill practice, peer-to-peer collaboration, and knowledge application within a real-world context. When individuals demonstrate what they can do on video, evaluators get an authentic representation of their competency. Bongo was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in Loveland, Colorado.
Report Date: April 2026
Contact Information:
Bruce Fischer – Chief Technology Officer – [email protected]
Cooper Scott – Product Manager – [email protected]
Zach Hittle – Software Engineer – [email protected]
Notes
Evaluation Methods Used:
The Bongo development team incorporates accessibility best practices into our design and development processes. Our designers build and maintain design patterns and components with accessibility and consistency in mind. Accessibility tests are integrated into the unit testing and integration testing phases of our development process. Our key testing methods that are used during our development process are listed below. These testing types are referenced the Remarks and Explanations column to indicate how we tested the success criteria for each requirement:
- Manual Accessibility Testing: Browser & keyboard testing with visual verification
- Screen Reader Testing: NVDA/Chrome, NVDA/Firefox
- Color Contrast Testing: Chrome Developer Tools with the Wave extension, Firefox developer accessibility tool
- Screen Magnifier Testing: Browser zoom capability with visual verification
Applicable Standards/Guidelines
This report covers the degree of conformance for the following accessibility standard/guidelines:
Terms
The terms used in the Conformance Level information are defined as follows:
- Supports: The functionality of the product has at least one method that meets the criterion without known defects or meets with equivalent facilitation.
- Partially Supports: Some functionality of the product does not meet the criterion.
- Does Not Support: The majority of product functionality does not meet the criterion.
- Not Applicable: The criterion is not relevant to the product.
Not Evaluated: The product has not been evaluated against the criterion. This can be used only in WCAG 2.0 Level AAA.
This report covers the degree of conformance for the following accessibility standard/guidelines:
WCAG 2.x Report
Note: When reporting on conformance with the WCAG 2.x Success Criteria, they are scoped for full pages, complete processes, and accessibility-supported ways of using technology as documented in the WCAG 2.1 Conformance Requirements.